• Home
  • About
    • Leadership
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Issues
    • Defunding Police
    • Qualified Immunity
    • Restore Respect
  • Blog
  • Media Room
  • Contact
    • Do Not Contact
  • Contribute
National Police Support FundNational Police Support Fund
National Police Support FundNational Police Support Fund
  • Home
  • About
    • Leadership
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Issues
    • Defunding Police
    • Qualified Immunity
    • Restore Respect
  • Blog
  • Media Room
  • Contact
    • Do Not Contact
  • Contribute

Qualified Immunity vs. Absolute Immunity: What’s the Difference?

Qualified Immunity vs. Absolute Immunity - National Police Support Fund

Qualified Immunity vs. Absolute Immunity: What’s the Difference?

November 5, 2020 Issues Facing Police, News, Updates

As debates about qualified immunity for police continue, we thought it would be helpful to examine qualified immunity vs. absolute immunity to show how they differ and how they are applied to people within the criminal justice field. 

Absolute Immunity

Absolute immunity provides legal protection to judges, prosecutors, legislators, and executive officials for actions committed in their official duties without malice or corrupt motives. Absolute immunity protects these individuals from both criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits.

In addition to high-level legal and government officials, witnesses testifying in court have absolute immunity (though they are still subject to perjury), as do Presidential aides who can make the case it’s necessary for them to complete their jobs.

The President of the United States, however, only has absolute immunity from civil claims, not criminal charges. The Supreme Court issued this ruling in Nixon v. Fitzgerald in 1968 — a case involving a lawsuit filed by a government contractor against Richard Nixon while he was President.

Qualified Immunity vs. Absolute Immunity - National Police Support Fund

However, it’s important to keep in mind that absolute immunity only applies to acts committed within the scope of the official’s duties. And, it does not apply to police officers, who generally operate under qualified immunity protections.

Qualified Immunity

While not as robust as absolute immunity, qualified immunity still offers several important legal protections for police officers so they can focus on keeping their communities safe without fear of unnecessary retribution.

According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School, qualified immunity “protects a government official from lawsuits alleging that the official violated a plaintiff’s rights, only allowing suits where officials violated clearly-established law.

Like absolute immunity, qualified immunity shields police officers and other government officials from frivolous lawsuits, ensuring that they can make the best decisions for their situation without fear of unnecessary legal action. 

In the 2009 case Person v. Callahan, the Supreme Court said, “qualified immunity balances two important interests—the need to hold public officials accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the need to shield officials from harassment, distraction, and liability when they perform their duties reasonably.”

Understanding the Difference

At a time when being a police officer is more precarious than ever, it’s important to understand which legal protections apply to law enforcement officers. Someone thinking they’re covered under absolute immunity might make different decisions than someone who knows the facts of qualified immunity.

As a grassroots education and support organization, the National Police Support fund is committed to helping its members understand the important differences between absolute immunity and qualified immunity, and how they impact the day-to-day work of law enforcement officers throughout the country. 

For more information on qualified immunity, visit our facts page at: nationalpolicesupportfund.com/qualified-immunity-fact-page/.

Join National Police Support Fund

RECENT NEWS

  • Disrespect for Police Continues in Chicago
  • December 2020 News Roundup
  • A Common-Sense Approach to Police Reform
  • What You Need to Know About Cell Phone Evidence
  • National Police Support Fund Welcomes Retired Police Officer As Newest Board Member
  • California Proposition 25 Defeated, Thanks in Part to Local Efforts Funded by National Police Support Fund

ARCHIVES

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • March 2017

CATEGORIES

  • 2018 Elections
  • Candidates & Elections
  • Defunding
  • From Leadership
  • Issues Facing Police
  • Media
  • National Police Week
  • News
  • News Roundup
  • Op-Eds
  • Press Release
  • Restore Respect
  • Updates

Contact Us

National Police Support Fund, Inc.

Office/Mailing Address:
2800 Eisenhower Drive Suite 220
Alexandria, VA 22314

Donation Processing Center:
PO Box 26248
Alexandria, VA 22313-2648

Phone: (571) 364-6520
Email: info@nationalpolicesupportfund.com

NAVIGATION

  • Home
  • About
    • Leadership
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Issues
    • Defunding Police
    • Qualified Immunity
    • Restore Respect
  • Blog
  • Media Room
  • Contact
    • Do Not Contact
  • Contribute

Sign Up for News Updates

Contributions to the National Police Support Fund are not tax deductible. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Paid for by National Police Support Fund, Inc. | Privacy & Refund Policy

Prev Next